Foundational Resources
Foundational Resources
Essential guides and documentation for understanding TAR fundamentals
2019 Bolch Judicial Institute TAR Guidelines
What it is
- General Guide that Goes Over TAR 1.0
Topics covered
- TAR 1.0
The following paper was published in 2019 and emphasizes TAR 1.0. guidance.
Comments on “The Implications of Rule 26(g) on the Use of Technology-Assisted Review”
What it is
- Maura R. Grossman and Gordon V. Cormack††law review article on TAR
Topics covered
- Implications of Rule 26(g) on the Use of Technology-Assisted Review
In a recent Federal Courts Law Review article titled “The
Implications of Rule 26(g) on the Use of Technology-Assisted Review,”1
Karl Schieneman and Thomas C. Gricks III address important issues
surrounding the use of technology-assisted review (“TAR”) in electronic
discovery. Schieneman and Gricks assert that Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(g) (“Rule 26(g)”) imposes “unique obligations”2
on responding parties that use TAR to produce documents in response to
discovery requests.